'O Rising One'.

 

November was a very productive month in Nazaré, with the hull finished except for the top coats of paint, and the interior getting into shape too. We are all set up for a big effort to launch in the Spring.

Along with improving life at home, it is remarkable what a hold this project has on me, after five years of uphill struggle. The more the world seems to be going to Hell in a handbasket, the less I find myself inclined to pay much attention to it! After all, as I see it, millions are dying before they ought to be, and the mainstream media only talk about those aspects of it that they want to. I have looked in vain for reference in the Guardian for example to the recent debate in Westminster about the proposed new WHO treaty. If they think they have to guard anything, national and individual sovereignty in such matters ought to be very high on their priorities. Well, I will settle for asserting my sovereignty as best I can, and for proving how good life can be in that little zone over which I have a degree of control.

Coming home in the old citroen with Fiona was fun. Here are some photos from the ferry leaving Santander:-

As long as we manage to keep the sense of fun alive, we must be doing something right. Chances are, if we play, we can also pray; and according to Fr Simon at his talk in Glenstal the other day, the two make the essence of the Lord's Day, which the longest of the ten commandments bids us to keep holy.

I have the temerity in fact to associate the renovation of the 'Anna M' with the rediscovery of such truths. Sunday Mass in the Sanctuario de Nossa Senhora da Nazaré has greatly helped me to keep at it anyway, and this Gannetsway, which the project celebrates, constitutes what for myself is the heartland of Catholicism. Transcendent notions do need to be grounded in physical realities like geography, by virtue of the mystery of the incarnation which we celebrate at Christmas, and which makes Christian faith so distinctive,- without it religious faith can indeed be very oppressive.

Meanwhile, since I cannot expect most people to share such ideas yet, the Sea, 'the common sacrament of Man' according to Hilaire Belloc, provides a challenge, a value system and a basis for authority that I hope they will find very difficult to deny. The sea, at least, does not suffer fools gladly! And either we deliver this project or we don't, but we shall try very hard.... Happy Christmas all!

Advent star from the gate of Glenstal Abbey,

O Oriens, splendor lucis aeternae et sol justitiae, veni, et illumina sedentes in tenebris, et umbra mortis.

O rising one, splendor of eternal light and sun of justice, come, shine on those who sit in darkness and the shadow of death.

The Fog Is Clearing.

Granny and Iris.

            It’s been two months now since I posted on this blog. I have been on one hand living a great life at home in County Clare with Fiona, whom I was so fortunate as to marry 56 years ago today; also with three sons and their children near at hand. There’s a lot to be said for being a retired grandfather! Yet on the other hand I have been in something of a state of paralysis on various fronts.

The most basic is the task of figuring out the way ahead with the Anna M. A robust plan of campaign was elusive, but we do seem to have achieved it now, and I should after all have the resources to get her back in the water next Spring . However, if  she is not paying her way within two years, she will have to be sold. The short slide presentation here lays out the plan.

Meanwhile I continue to wrestle with more existential problems. For instance, how come it is so difficult to talk honestly about the excess deaths that are occurring especially in the most ‘advanced’ countries of the world? Or even about the covid pandemic itself? It was shrouded in lies from the beginning, with all that talk of coming directly from animals in the wet market, and with anyone who mentioned the Institute of Virology up the road being dismissed as a ‘conspiracy’ loonie. Then came all the obfuscation and downright lies about the vaccines. 

It seems sometimes that the Mainstream Media and our entire democratic set-up have finally taken leave of Truth. Major casualties are the UN and the WHO, though the latter’s power grab seems to plough on regardless of any accountability. The longer this situation goes on, the more radical is the breakdown of trust, the less tenable is any middle ground and the more radical the disintegration that is in danger of tearing democracies apart. 

Had the autocrats and oligarchs of the world invented a weapon to do so, they could not have done better. What they thrive on is the fear of death, chaos and social disintegration; nothing suits them better than to be able to point at democracies unable to form stable governments, democrats at each other’s throats and unable to protect their citizens as they struggle on in a state of isolation and confusion. 

There are other candidates for the prize of maximum divisiveness and confusion, notably the Ukraine war and climate change. Perhaps I will be virulently condemned for even suggesting that these may not be clear-cut issues, and much as we would love to see Ukrainians living in peace and security, there may be better ways to achieve it than through war, and likewise we will not stabilise the climate and our way of life by attempting to decarbonise too fast and by demonising CO2.

Such is the balancing act of those of us who continue to occupy what seems an ever more precarious centre ground. To those who claim that we are merely ducking the issues, refusing to commit one way or the other, I would like to quote the words of Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich, spoken yesterday as he opened the current Synod in Rome, of which he is the ‘Relator General’:-

‘ When we walk, Christ is the centre. There are people on the right, on the left, there are those who walk further ahead, there are those who take longer and stay behind: it is normal when we walk together. We must learn that certain tensions in the Church are normal: it means the Church is close to the people, because not everyone thinks in the same way on all continents, on all issues. So it is important to listen with a lot of respect, also for different cultures, seeking God's will, to decide together the way forward…..

‘Since there are several people who ‘place’ me on the left, let us say that I am walking on the left. If I take Christ as the centre and look at Him from the left, I do not see Him alone, I see Christ with the people walking on the right. I cannot see Christ without also seeing them: that means that those walking on the right are also part of my community. It means we have to walk together. I hope the same experience happens to those who are walking on the right side, those who go forward, those who go behind….’

Surely here there is a moral for us all, though of course the Cardinal with his ‘if I take Christ as the centre’ is assuming that we look at Him with love and revere Him as the Truth. If we try to substitute some abstract version of the Truth, a mere intellectual construct, it just won’t work. One is likely to find oneself with no alternative to looking at some strutting tin-pot dictator, who insists that we believe his version of truth, or else jumping into an abyss. 

I believe that those guys in funny clothes in Rome represent our chief hope of saving democracy and indeed civilization,- so God help us, and them! Some will find this an outlandish idea, and others will be only too delighted if they can portray the Synod as a major bust-up and a failure; but for myself, as St Peter had it, there just ain’t no other place to go!

ps, Robert Kennedy for President!

 

'Fool me once....'

It seems as if a whole age has passed since I first put the Anna M on the concrete in Nazaré five years ago, and we are now living in a different world. I find it particularly alarming for two contrary reasons,- on one hand because the pandemic brought home to some of us at least just how immediate is the threat of totalitarianism even here in Europe, what the Powers are capable of doing once the public can be sufficiently scared, and on the other because at this stage so many people just want to forget about the whole affair. The saying ‘Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me’ comes to mind. There are some lessons that must be learned.

Exactly what the ‘Powers’ may be is hard to say. It is evident at least that there has been a massive transfer of wealth from the general population to a few multi-billionaires,- also that shadowy someones succeeded in getting governments all over the world to abandon their own protocols and fall into lockstep behind a disastrous narrative and course of action, which they are currently doing their best to avoid discussing, and so we now find a Resistance lining up against these ostriches (or snakes as the case may be). 

To what extent we need to resist an organised conspiracy, or a fortuitous confluence of interests in money, power and ‘scientism’, is perhaps impossible to determine, but certainly whatever-it-is reflects what Pope St John-Paul II used to call the ‘culture of death’, which has seen the steady erosion of the right to life and the acceptance of abortion, euthanasia and so on. This in turn is in line with the eugenicist movement of the 1930s, which had however to keep its head down for a while after the full horror of Nazism unfolded, and resulted in the Nuremberg Code in 1947. Unfortunately, the principles which it laid down have been flagrantly flouted in these recent years.

We may consider three basic categories of persons in connection with the onset of totalitarianism:- power mongers, including the deluded and the cynical ones, who for example find it in themselves to party while ordering the masses into a cruel and destructive lock-down,- then those caught perhaps between an easy life with some nice financial perks or making things difficult for themselves and possibly losing their job or worse, who merge into the crowd who simply decline to seriously interrogate either the prevailing narrative or themselves, for reasons which are however best left to themselves to figure out, because accusing them of being lazy or afraid will not get us anywhere, and might not be altogether fair anyway. Then there are the resisters.

It has to be said straight way that the later also face pitfalls, such as, too readily casting themselves as illuminati, aligning themselves with every cause agin’ the government, and vociferously objecting to anything which might impinge on their personal liberty. So it is that we are finding scepticism about the official narrative of the pandemic and the vaccines aligning in some hefty quarters almost automatically with climate denialism and scepticism about the EU and the war in Ukraine, and frequently with support for the famous American ex-president currently in trouble with the law. 

It is also true that fear, though it is the common feature of totalitarianism, does have its own raison d'être. After all fear does have its place in the scheme of things, as surely the bravest of soldiers will admit! Anyone who goes to war with no sense of fear or danger is not likely to last long; but one cannot learn from fear so long as it remains unacknowledged, unrecognised. This is the kind of fear that makes people cling to their precious narrative regardless of any facts. Going to war remains necessary in some sense, if we are to defend civilisation from disintegration, but we must let our causes be constantly tested against facts and results!

It is a fact that the world is getting hotter, and there is sufficient reason to believe that fossil fuel burning has a lot to do with it, to make it only prudent to drastically reduce our dependence on it. Anyway it is a dirty business. We didn't have to wait till coal got too scarce or expensive in order to replace steam engines with electric ones! As for the pandemic, then we saw, up close and personal, lies promulgated about the vaccines being 'safe and effective', our basic freedoms suspended, and digital passports for the exercise of basic rights issued on condition of compliance with that suspension. In China we are already witnessing where such totalitarian control leads. It is worth quoting from the chilling account of Tahir Harmut Izgil in the Guardian:-

We heard that, beginning in late 2016, everyone’s data was being entered into a system known as the Integrated Joint Operations Platform(IJOP). On the basis of this data, the police - and especially the neighbourhood police - marked the file of each individual they considered dangerous. Since everyone’s ID cards were linked via the internet to the IJOP, anyone with a mark on their file would set off the siren when they scanned their ID card at the ubiquitous police checkpoints, and would be apprehended on the spot….

    We may anticipate that there will be no shortage of crises to give governments excuses for such measures. The climate crisis may well make a contribution, on the basis of carbon credits and so on. One way or another, if we do not stand against it, such control is coming our way fast. Artificial intelligence will enable only a small cadre to exercise control. Some serious voices are saying that we have perhaps only a couple of years to effectively mount resistance to the onset of an appalling global tyranny, and that we have only a fast-closing window of opportunity to prevent it from becoming established. Even if this proves alarmist, we know well that it is better to mount resistance early than too late. Yet how rarely this has occurred in the past!

It is not to be expected that such resistance will be all harmonious. Differences of opinion and approach there will be in any aspect of life and political movements in particular, and genuine politics results from their interplay. I am not proposing to think in terms of some new party. What is essential is that we establish modes of communication and structures of mutual respect and trust, both online and in physical reality. Some like myself may well believe that to enable this there is ultimately no substitute for ‘the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit’, but meanwhile we must be open to goodwill wherever it comes from.

    To make any kind of start, I suggest a few propositions which would need to be more or less accepted, such as:-

• The covid pandemic was scandalously mismanaged, and the vaccines which were said many times to be ‘safe and effective’ were neither. 

• The blanket mainstream coverage of both the wildfires and the pandemic have a certain déjà vu quality in common, in marked contrast to the coverage of vaccine harms and excess deaths.

• The world is indeed overheating, in part at least because of the greenhouse gases which we are putting into the atmosphere. This is resulting in tides of displaced persons and refugees, whose plight must to be responded to on an international basis, as does the threat of nuclear Armageddon and other threats such as the pollution and over-fishing of the oceans.

• Governments and oligarchs have apparently an inbuilt tendency to grasp more and more power over our lives, while technology is opening up horrifying new possibilities for doing so.

• Meanwhile the claims of governments to represent the interests of their populations grow thinner by the day, as they fail in such basic matters as the real economy and public debt, housing, the support of family life and the birth rate, the maintenance of health services and law and order, while marching to the tune of heaven-knows-what which is antithetical to these interests. 

• We will not do developing countries any good by sucking out all their best and brightest, to make up for the fact that we are too sick or lazy to rear our own children, and it also has to be remembered that 'good fences make good neighbours'.

• None of us want our societies overwhelmed by debt, any more than by foreigners.

• Both national governments and the EU are in various ways nonetheless essential to our peace and prosperity. They will only thrive and function benignly if full subsidiarity and accountability be reclaimed, which currently means a radical change of direction. In Ireland and elsewhere, local democracy badly needs to be developed.

• Another thing that needs to be considered is the establishment of local currencies, with their own banks. It is in working together that the necessary trust may be established.

• Perhaps the implosion of Twitter will provide the occasion for a rethink about how best to discuss this kind of thing online?

• The most basic requirement is that we do not succumb to censorship and isolation, but establish actual communities of people who know each other and can interact and communicate physically on an ongoing basis. Wherever we encounter people who do not feel free to say what they think, we are losing the battle against totalitarianism.

• We should not accept notions that undermine basic axioms of our culture, such as that God made the human race male and female, that marriage is the union of a man and a woman, or that we have a duty to protect innocent human lives. We must defend the family, based on real marriage.

• We need to work every way we can to reclaim subsidiarity, bolster local community, make sure education is atuned to parents, foster resilience and self-sufficiency.

  

  This is mainly about protecting the vegetables from the west wind.

  
  

     Last comment, on a more personal note, let those who can keep the freedom of the seas! For one thing, we will need the kind of resilience that the sea breeds. For another, air travel is too easy to control, and indeed the taps may get turned off wherever one depends on fossil fuel. I propose to do all I can to keep open the ancient sailing route between the West of Ireland and the Iberian peninsula…. See The Gannetsway Project.

The Father's Business in the Realm of Appalldom.

When the 12 year-old Jesus went awol, and Mary and Joseph eventually tracked him down in the Temple 'sitting among the doctors, listening to them and asking them questions', he responded to his mother's reproaches by saying 'Did you not know that I must be busy with my Father's affairs?' (Luke 2:41-50) He hardly felt so driven out of a mere academic interest. 'The Father's Business' was surely about vital concerns such as how to reveal truth and empower justice, with due respect for the freedom and integrity of wayward and stubborn humanity, in a world overcome with lies and injustice; about how we poor creatures may find life while all too often we find ourselves in that state of 'quiet desperation' that I call 'appalldom'; about how to make sense of it all, to construct a narrative that works and may reconcile mankind with God.

The seriousness with which such concerns engage some teenage minds should never be underestimated. Much so-called education tends to steamroll over them, crushing them into the ground. Then again adults in the midst of their care have little time for those concerns; and indeed how can one live life when there are so many appalling things going on, if one stops to think about them all the time? The young and the old however may find some common ground in finding that they can't help but do just this. It should be the concern of educators to support them in doing so, while encouraging and indeed challenging youngsters to think for themselves, to critically evaluate all the stuff coming at them, to value and seek out coherence and consistancy; teaching them about the age-old struggle of humanity to realise truth and justice. To do so, one has to share one's own problems. We all have to wrestle with problems about what we may and may not say, for a start. We do possess a mysterious inbuilt sense of truth and falsehood, justice and injustice, but following that 'steep and narrow' path is not easy for any of us. That the rich and powerful rarely do so should be no surprise, considering that they inevitably see the world through the lens of their own wealth and power.

It is a very old story. Now however it has acquired a universal aspect, with a very small plutocracy equipped with the technology and wealth to potentially dominate the whole world. That this threat is very real, immediate and personal, has been brought home to many of us by the treatment meted out to us in the recent pandemic. It is a new experience for most of us who are fortunate enough to live in Western democracies to realise that our governments and much of the media continue to lie to us, for instance about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines; that they have clearly been following some alien agenda. As it increasingly takes on the aspect of deliberate and calculated attempt to 'put one over on us', causing many of us to find ourselves appalled at the immediate prospect of digital control over every aspect of our lives, we are only too justified in being wary of similar techniques of instigating panic and scape-goating dissidents to enable drastic authoritarian methods of control. 

Some are inclined to throw the war in Ukraine and the climate problems into the same basket. This is probably simplistic. We would all like to have a tidy narrative, arranging truth and falsehood, good and bad in accordance with the notions of our own tribe, which spares us the pain and difficulty of thinking for ourselves, and enables us to find shelter from the relentless bombardment of stuff which frequently seems to be sweeping away the whole structure of life as we have known it. But the tendency to throw global warming and the war in Ukraine into the same box as the pandemic, only alarms me further, even while I recognise for instance the clear linkage between the military-industrial complex and its pharmaceutical cousin. 

In the case of the war, the trouble is that the history of American wars since Vietnam makes it difficult to credit the more venerable narrative of the Land of the Free standing up to bullies. Years ago, discussions of such matters with my Dad always came back to his saying, 'Well we were very glad of them in 1941', to which I really had no answer; but it seemed to me that the wheels came off that narrative finally when President Kennedy was assassinated. I am tentatively hoping that this Robert Kennedy Jnr may be going to get America somewhere near back on track, but when I hear him say that, for instance, 'he would settle the Ukraine war on day one', I can only say 'I wish'. My opinion is that the only people who can really settle it are the Russians, by having another revolution, though one wonders whether it may really turn out to be more benign than the Bolshevik one! Meanwhile the whole world should facilitate it by supporting the Ukrainians.

To hear intellectuals and pundits whom one respects spouting Russian propaganda is painful enough, but they too have to be heard. Unfortunately, the art of good lying is to keep a good footing in truth, while none of us are in full possession of the latter. To sort it out, the first necessity is to listen to all, so long as there is a reasonable chance the differing views are being advanced in good faith. The moment when you introduce censorship, whether you are a Putin or the 'liberal' media,  you have lost it. At least spotting the lies is good sport, and training youngsters to do so needs to be foremost in the mind of educators, even including through physical sports.

One excellent way of doing so is to take them sailing, and going to sea is a mighty antidote to lies and soft thinking. I'm still hoping to be able to do so before the year is out, but am struggling with finance. Sailing north in July is out. I'm now hoping to sail for the Guadiana for the coming winter, and with a functioning electric drive. I have come to the point where I see the ability to do so, to sail the sea freely and without the necessity of paying for diesel oil, as a little act of defiance in the face of the advancing digital totalitarianism the likes of the WEF, the WHO and even the EU are preparing for us all, - while at the same time affirming my faith in the transition from fossil fuels. Let's hope for a host of sailors happy to find their fun in such a way!

Meanwhile, the dogs are calling me for a walk. It's a tough life here in West Clare, while work goes ahead slowly on the 'Anna M', thanks particularly to my Russian friend Tole.  I am getting down to work with him about ten days a month. Those flights from Shannon to Porto however get expensive in July and August, while we have lots of people to look after at home. Big effort coming up in the autumn, and volunteers welcome!

photos by Anna and John.

Afloat in July?

    Spring is gradually giving way to Summer, albeit in fits and starts here in Ireland, where after a couple of radiant days we are liable to find ourselves back in chilly dampness. Dare we hope that the triumph of hope and confidence over hardship and doubt will extend beyond the turn of the seasons? There are many levels on which we may harbour possibly furtive expectations that this may be the case, and despite the lurking fear that we shall inevitably be disappointed, we struggle on in the hope that perhaps we may even live to see them all fire up together!

    We tend to become so numbed by the big boggies,- war, environmental degradation, economic

Salamanca cathedral

hardship, false narratives of all kinds - that we forget to rejoice in the little triumphs that do come our way, which is why thankfulness is so important, not to mention praise. Thankfulness to whom? Praise of whom? I do not see how life can work if we cannot find our way to some kind of faith in God; but what's more, if we are not to become caught up in some kind of phantasm exterior to our human becoming, it is necessary to settle for trying to encounter God in Jesus, crucified and risen, and to believe that he does indeed await us in the midst of all our striving and the relationships that it entails.

 

Palm Sunday in Nazaré

  So now, having got that off my chest, I am happy to report solid progress with the 'Anna M'. The epoxy/glass skin is at last finished, and it now has to be only smoothed and painted. Excellent weather and a great crew came together for the job: Arturo, a Portuguese American who grew up in New York, Anatoli from Siberia, Lulu from Belfast, and myself. It is fun to thus find ourselves transcending the stupid conflict between Russians and Americans, not to mention the little problem on our island of Ireland between north and south. The sea and sea-faring doing it again!

'Anna M's epoxy skin

    Progress is also being made below decks, and Arturo has moved aboard as mate, cook and general factotum. If only we can overcome the financial problems, and Alec can get his act together, we intend to sail north in July, with him aboard and his electric drive installed. He will be on the lookout for a partner interested in commercializing the electric drive project.

Brilliant crew, job done!

    We envisage a whole new kind of sailing sport, which will put the emphasis back on using the wind as motive power, and only using the motor when absolutely necessary. As explained in previous posts, the idea is that the propeller charges the batteries when one is sailing well. There will of course also be as many solar panels as possible. The less batteries one has, the more skill and patience will be needed; but down the road one may look to hydrogen fuel cells for 'real grunt'.

    It's been a long haul, while I have become a kind of commuter between Nazaré and West Clare. Now that the pandemic is past, it is great to see improvement in communications between the two picking up promptly. Brittany Ferries has the new ship 'Salamanca' on the run from Rosslare to Bilbao (and the motorway to Nazaré on which Salamanca is a great half-way stop), which is quicker and more stable than the old one, and leaves clean air behind instead of a big black smudge. I was kindly given a tour of the engine room, also spectacularly clean with its gas-powered engines, shoving the ship along calmly at 20 knots against a fresh SW breeze. But most of the up and down has to be done by air, and the new Ryanair flight between Shannon and Porto certainly makes the journey a lot easier. 

One of 'Salamanca's two engines

Early bird in Porto, two hours to Shannon.

    

    

    

    For all the wonders of technology, I would rather make the journey in the 'Anna M'! How I hope to be able to do so again! Still, rebuilding her has been fun in itself, and it is important because she represents the moment before modern sailing boats became completely different to the load-bearing vessels of the past. I still entertain the hope that the concepts we are playing around with in her will find commercial applications both for fishing and freight. 

    Meanwhile, talking of hope, I have to record my excitement at the candidacy of Robert Kennedy Jnr for the American presidency, my admiration for his courage and prayers for his safety and success.

'Infection Control'.

Prof Martin Cormican, expert in ‘infection control’ and member of NPHET, the national committee which ‘guided’ Ireland’s response to the pandemic, is now talking of the ‘many mistakes he believes Ireland made and what needs to change in the next pandemic’. This is promising talk, apart from the inference that the next pandemic is just around the corner. After all the last one was a century ago, on the tail of the Great War. Since it seems more and more probable that this last one came out of a laboratory, could it be that he knows more about it than we do? Anyway, I have not heard that he repents of his statement last year that:-

‘A legal obligation to accept vaccination should be considered a legitimate public policy option in circumstances where declining to accept vaccination has profound adverse consequences for society as a whole. We should consider if it is possible to develop a social consensus and a legal framework around this not just for the next pandemic but also for other circumstances where the choice of a small proportion of people to decline vaccination imposes great burdens and costs on other citizens.’

  It is one thing for NPHET to recommend vaccines, and an altogether different thing to point the finger at those who refuse to take them, and load them up with the blame for all the dreadful things which they are allegedly doing to the populace at large. This happens to be a classic old trick of the worst of totalitarian dictators.

        It reminds me of an encounter with a man in his fifties whom I count as an old friend, in 2021. ‘Are you vaccinated?’ says he. ‘Not likely’ says I. ‘Well stay away from us!’ ‘I thought I was the one who was supposed to be at risk’, says I. Imagine; my friend was vaccinated, and therefore supposed to be protected; I was in my mid seventies, had just had a course of radiation therapy for cancer, and therefore supposed to be especially vulnerable. By what contortion of logic was I going to ‘impose great burdens and costs’ on my friend?

It was a sobering reminder that totalitarian instincts are never far away in a climate of fear. Far from being assuaged by the 'great and good', this line of thought was adopted and promoted by them with truly astonishing universality, with the President of France even expressing his intention to ‘emmerder les non-vaccinés’ (drag the unvaccinated through the shit’).

     Apparently they all actually believed that their precious vaccines were going to put a stop to both transmission and infection, but they had absolutely no excuse for still clinging to this belief by the time Professor Cormican made the above statement last year. They even largely continue to do so today, when so much more knowledge of the adverse effects as well as the ultimate uselessness of the vaccines is available.

With neither apology nor retraction of their false promises, they eventually fell back on insisting that those who refused vaccination were flooding the hospitals, while meanwhile everywhere those doctors who were successfully treating covid at an early stage, or even raised awkward questions, were being given endless grief and if possible silenced. Nowadays, with many more patients suffering and dying in all kinds of ways related to the covid response than from the disease itself, those who criticise that response still find it difficult to make their voices heard.

The disturbing questions concerning the closing down of open debate and the failures to research properly and discuss the effectiveness and safety of the response, especially of the vaccines, and even the origin of the pandemic, are more urgent than ever. How did the astonishing lies about them come to sweep the globe, sweeping aside many of the principles and protocols previously established for the handling of pandemics?

In due course my wife and I caught covid from a double vaccinated son. He suffered more from the dose than we did; we would put it down to our homoeopathic prophylactic, though we were also taking a vitamin d supplement etc. Whatever the reason, we have always believed that it is better to foster our immune systems holistically than to seek to manipulate and force them. In addition to simple organic principles, this approach is rooted in our religious conviction that our bodies are ‘temples of the Holy Spirit’. Such a conviction is incompatible with opening the doors to convicted criminals, such as the major pharmaceutical companies, let alone to letting them freely break in through the walls, which is what forced vaccination amounts to. Meanwhile of course the invaders refuse to take responsibility for the damage they cause.

To a layman like myself, to try to force vaccination on people also appears to contradict every principle of law from Habeas Corpus (Your Body Is Yours) onwards. I might mention the Nuremberg Code and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Look them up! Whatever one thinks about the vaccinations, it should be obvious that the attempt to force them on people, backed up by digital health passports, is a red line that must not on any account be crossed. I remain in disbelief at the fact that for a while the likes of us could not even travel or go into a pub or cafe for the want of that bit of paper! Apartheid how are you?

Anyway is it not astounding to reflect upon the ease with which we were all deprived of basic liberties, our businesses, pubs, sports and even churches closed down? Where was the democratic process and consent? Professor Cormican has apparently been active in the cause of battery hens. Are people like him even so much as equally concerned about human freedom and dignity? Do they not see that the vast majority of us must now consider ourselves in danger of being  encaged, subject to the whims of a tiny minority of would-be ‘keepers’ who happen to be hiding in full sight when the WHO or the WEF come round? We have been warned, the tools are in place. All that’s required are further means to stoke fear!

What about our own pusillanimous concurrence? The good news is that the grace and strength to resist remain readily available. Speaking up still counts, and we remain relatively free to do so. Still, it may well be wise to assume that those tools of digital surveillance and control will have their day, as indeed they already have in many places. We have to build the networks, the community and solidarity, whatever way we can, to resist. This does demand engaging in the perilous business of narrative building, which should not on any account be left to the professional politicians.

Some of them seem to be hanging grimly on the left/right thing, which to my mind is inappropriate.  In particular I don’t fancy the tendency to lump the opinions expressed above with Euroscepticism and even climate denialism. I do see where the people who do so are coming from. We have had a stern reminder of the tale of Chicken Licken, and the likely counterproductive effects of fearing the End is Nigh. For a start, it is very difficult to actually see much evidence that the climate is indeed on course for catastrophic change here in Ireland. Frankly I hardly see it at all, and I have lived pretty close to Nature for a long time. I find it implausible anyway that we can do much about it, especially with the ‘command and control’ approach that governments adopt. Still, the evidence of warming seas and collapsing ice-sheets can hardly be ignored. The mechanisms at work are fairly comprehensible. The oil companies were sitting on the warnings of their own scientists for many years.

If it is only to free ourselves from the clutches of those massive corporations, and from the even dodgier people, such as Putin and that Saudi Prince MBS, who profit from fossil fuels, it is obviously desirable to escape our extreme dependence on them. What's more, I hope to be showing in my own little undertakings what fun it may be. Fostering our immune systems, exercising  our right to say what we think, producing our own food and fuel, sailing around the Gannetsway in as self-reliant way as possible; these  are all skills and abilities that will be lost if we do not use them!   

In democratic societies, we expect our institutions to be open, responsive and accountable, not under the sway of shady alien interests. Evidently we are falling short. We might be said to be already under partial occupation by the Enemy. We must build up our resistance every way we can if we want to keep our health, our freedom and our rights!                

ps, I just posted a video version!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTcs5CRzwUI

pps, I have received the odd comment that calls for a reply, but I don't see whom it came from. If you wish me to reply, please give an email address with your comment. Mine is gannetsway(at)gmail.com

Brother Anselm Hurt OSB, - a Truth-Seeker.

    When I was coming of age in the 1960s, we liked to think that we were a privileged generation, who could perhaps put Big Misery along with a heap of lies finally behind us, and build a new world of tolerance and enlightenment. Bob Dylan and the Beatles were our guys! Needless to say, there remained some grave problems. Within the Catholic Church, there was talk of breaking out of the spiritual fortress within which our parents had prayed and worshipped in ways that related poorly, if at all, to secular life, or often even to our own personal experience. 

    As for Downside Abbey..., with its mighty church tower presiding over the Mendip hills (frontier between Celtic and Anglo-Saxon England), we were used to considering it a bastion of the Catholic Church in England, where it had managed to establish a reasonably comfortable relationship with the national establishment. The monastery had been described as 'the best gentlemen's club west of London', and as a headmaster's quip to an Etonian put it, 'Downside is what Eton was,- a school for Catholic gentlemen'! We thought that time was fast running out for this peculiar social and ecclesiastical niche, even in 1965. It turned out to be harder to despatch than we expected, but Dom Luke Suart, with the inspiration of Teilhard de Chardin behind him, thought that he had the makings of a new narrative for the place, one that would reconcile the arts and humanities with science, 'overcome the Cartesian split', and feature a Catholic Church renewed by the Second Vatican Council, at least on speaking terms with modernity, and enabling her children to 'take on' both their own subconscious and the secular world. 

    Luke was making a huge impression with his sixth form religious instruction course; I recall earnest debate as to whether he was mad or really on to something. There was an intensity about him that was at once impressive and unsettling. We were used to blissfully and quite successfully sopping up information for the purpose of regurgitating it in exams. Now this man was telling us this wasn't good enough, echoing indeed the likes of Dylan. It was vital that we learned to think for ourselves; the very future of the planet depended on this, according to Father Luke!

     Predictably enough, he soon ran into establishment buffers. Parents were paying large sums of money for us to pass exams and 'get on', whatever they said about a 'catholic education'. My Dad  was to be heard making noises about 'those monks'. Luke was gathering a circle of disciples, among whom was Brother Anselm, but then, his course suppressed, he had a nervous breakdown, and tragically he ended up jumping out of a hospital window. Nothing was said officially, in accordance with establishment practice, except some lame story of a heart attack. The truth leaked out by way of those monks with more integrity. In due course, the leading 'flower children', Doms Sebastian, Peter, Kevin and Anselm, found their way to the Downside parish in the Liverpool docklands (yes, there had already been attempts to counter the 'best gentlemen's club' narrative). They could go and have their revolution there!

    Fiona and I joined them, living in the parish youth leader's flat while I taught in a local school. The drab old parochial house really came to life, and that was where our friendship with Anselm really began. However the revolution had to wait. Part of the trouble was the preoccupation with the unresolved situation at Downside. There was an abbatial election coming up, and Peter had quite a lot of support. We had all sorts of 'post public school' ideas for the place, but Peter was not elected. Downside embarked on a long and painful decline, which has only accelerated with time. To this day, many of us feel loss. For poor Anselm the demoralisation back then was acute, and ended his career at Downside. 

    He worked in adult education in Liverpool and made two ultimately unsuccessful marriages, though for us he remained a warm and humane friend, and we know how fond he was of his three children. He was in a bad way when his relationship with their mother finally broke down and he had to leave his home. After a while he made his way to our house in Carrigaholt, eventually getting a caravan in our field. He was great to have about the house, helping the children with homework and then he was practically so very competant.He got to know Glenstal, and the community took him on as a gardener, before eventually, with great generosity, taking one very English failed priest into the community. 

    Anselm was sceptical, a tad rebelious, humorous, passionate, open, an avowed enemy of bullshit; perhaps, like his actor brother, inclined to be trying out roles to see which fitted! All in the interest of 'authenticity'; I suppose it's one of the ways we have of trying to get at the truth! No doubt this is always beyond us, but in the course of Anselm's lifetime, it is to be hoped that we have all learnt a thing or two about getting there, and that the attempt to reveal and understand it really is the supreme business of our lives, regardless of whether this involves the odd smash-up.

    Yet who would have thought that at the end of our lives, we sixties children would be back to looking at trenches and tank warfare in Europe, and massive lies rampaging through the world, for all our vaunted new self-knowledge? Now, for instance, about covid and these vaccines; will the truth ever be established and acknowledged? There is as ever a mountain of vested interest stacked up against naked truth! The rare sensitive souls who wrestle with it tend to get into all sorts of trouble, but we are all very much indebted to them.

    Something is finally coming to a head which, it seems to me, will determine humanity's fate in this twenty-first century! So we come back to the need which has shaped this story of Anselm, to get our heads out of our own little holes, and aspire to that One Big Story, wherein truth is fearlessly embraced and where even science and art can lie down together, not to mention the English and the Irish! It is the strain and the whiff of this story that constitutes the excitement of his life, along with his zest for life and simple physical things. At least he left us a very good recipe for marmalade!

Kennedy for the Enquiry!

So here we are, another New Year, and we wish each other a happy and healthy one. Labouring under not a few difficulties, progress with the 'Anna M' was slow enough last year, but we have arrived at a point where the main doubt about getting her on the water again this year is whether it will be possible to finance it. Not much to be said about that at the moment, so I shall revisit another little matter that has been making things difficult. I have not been writing about it lately, because I felt I had said what I have to say, and all I could do was give it time, for people who know more about it to have their say, and for the truth to come out. Now, however, there is a battle to be fought. The truth is coming out alright, from all kinds of quarters, but there remain very powerful people trying to suppress it. They are about as likely to admit that their narrative is false as President Putin is to disown his!

Our brave Taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, has announced that there will be an enquiry into the handling of the pandemic. 'Such an inquiry should not be about pointing fingers or ascribing blame. It’s going to be about getting to the truths, understanding what happened. What we did well, what we did badly, what could have been done better, because we can’t assume that this is going to be the last big pandemic in our lifetime,” he said.

Typical weasel words, meaning another whitewash. He and his global cronies continue to assure us that the vaccines are 'safe and effective', even while it becomes more and more clear that they are doing a lot more harm than good. The chances of them admitting same, let alone apologising, are vanishingly slim. On the contrary, they have not quite succeeded in forcing us to take their vaccines every few months for the rest of our lives, so the sooner they can drum up another big scare, the better they will be pleased.  But thank God for the likes of Robert Kennedy, who really is enabling us to 'get to the truths and understand what happened'. Will Varadkar read his book, 'The Real Anthony Fauci', let alone engage with what he says? If he does, any chance that like myself he will come to the conclusion that a lot of people, from Fauci down, need to go to prison?

As for Big Pharma, busy spending a good deal of their ill-gotten gains on huge new factories, is it conceivable that they will let their investments go to waste? Too right we may well assume there will be another big scare coming down the tracks! We may also assume that Varadkar and his likes will be in there cheer-leading the 'salvation' they will offer us. The suppression of those voices who really are interested in the truth will most probably be even more vicious than it has been this last time. The health service will become more and more dysfunctional, while we have to sit back and watch democracy and our civil rights being subverted. The only chance of an alternative is for certain people to be held accountable and real changes in our approach made. There are plenty of leads in Kennedy's book to make a start.

Here in Ireland, we may have  a pretty good place to do so. It's no wonder that Varadkar is not interested in 'ascribing blame'! Or perhaps he could explain the difference between this and the slightly less unfashionable notion of holding those responsible for lies, extortion and murder, or maybe simply moral cowardice and incompetence, to account? Come on Taoiseach, you and your likes have had a fine bandwagon supporting your story, let us hear the other side now. How about asking Robert Kennedy to come over and undertake that enquiry?

Light and Dark in the Old Country.